• Home
  • About
  • Podcast Archive
  • Subscribe (RSS)
  • Subscribe (iTunes)
  • Deacons
  • Live Events
  • Advertise With Us

Homebrewed Christianity

Equipping grassroots theologians for creative thinking, engaging, and living.

Living the Questions

You are here: Home / living / conversations / Defending Diana Butler Bass and those non-human animals

Defending Diana Butler Bass and those non-human animals

August 7, 2012 by Bo Sanders 11 Comments

Two weeks ago I got to sit down with Diana Butler Bass and ask her about everything from her new book’s title Christianity After Religion to the Methodist tradition and why Evangelical young people are 30 years behind.

It was a blast! [you can hear the audio here]

At the end of the hour, the last question was put forward by Darcy who asked about something Diana had alluded to in the Methodist question. Butler Bass had said that the early Methodist had historically A) ministered to the fringes and B) gone to the frontiers.

It was the fringes and the frontiers that Darcy wanted to know about. Only, she was not asking about the past. She wanted to know about the present.

 Who are on the fringes today and where is the frontier for us?

This is possibly the best question I have heard asked at one of our live events. 

Diana didn’t flinch. She outlined three such scenarios that would qualify:

The first was in the realm of sexuality.
The second was in the realm of pluralism.
The third dealt with our environment.

  •  In sexuality she articulated issues related to the transgendered community. This did not surprise me. In the LGBT formulation, T (transgendered) is the the one the raises eyebrows. Now, because I am came to this conversation through a friend who was doing Queer theology, I had initially taken the LGBTQ as a 5-part alliance. I did not realize how difficult the T can be (not to mention the Q) until I starting asking question and listening to stories. I quickly became aware of the complexities and complications involved.

In the two weeks since Diana’s answer I have had several conversation about her take and I have realized how much conversation has yet to be had. May God give us grace as we learn from each other.

  •  In religion she mentioned learning from Hindu friends. As a student at Claremont School of Theology I am very invested in and more than on board with the idea of inter-religious learning. Yesterday was my day off and so I (as Christian) headed to a Jewish bakery to  sit and listen to an audio recording I had about diversity within Islam.

I am always shocked at how much I don’t know and how much beauty there is within each tradition. May God give us grace as we learn from each other.

  •  In issues of environment and ecology, I like to think of myself as up to speed. This is a subject I have really investigated and as someone mentored by Randy Woodley (his new book Shalom and the Kingdom of Creation was just released and he will be on the podcast next week) I was tracking with her when she talked about non-human animals [I often allude to Nipples & Belly Buttons in this regard].

It should not have been surprising to me that with the release of the video of our conversation that she came under some suspicion by a group called IRB  (Institute on Religion and Democracy) as well as others for  her views on non-human animals.

From the blog Juicy Ecumenism here is the end of Diana’s answer and their commentary:

“Non-human animals and their experience of our environment of the divine are a place that human animals need to listen in order to create more full understanding of God’s creation. […] They don’t have voices like humans do, but isn’t that part of my prejudice?”

I don’t like to bring up the slippery slope, but the mud’s looking pretty slick from here.

What IS surprising to me is that – of her three answers about the fringes and frontiers – that seemed to be the least inflammatory of the three answers!

In my humble opinion, her pluralism answer and her sexuality answer were FAR more daring – and challenging! The only thing that I can figure is that some Christians have so bought into the Cartesian dualism regarding humans that both Transgendered and Hindu folks are completely off their radar screen … but don’t you DARE say what you said about listening to non-human animals.

I was prepared to defend Diana Butler Bass after our show – she said some daring things -  I just didn’t think that it would be on the issue of creation-care over sexuality and pluralism.

This contemporary religious environment will never cease to surprise me.

 

  • Share on Facebook.
  • Share on Twitter.
Filed Under: conversations, engaging, latest, thinking Tagged With: animals, Bible, book, books, care, Christian, church, Clooney, conservative, controversy, creation, Diana Butler Bass, environment, gay, God, Hindu, history, humans, interreligious, IRB, Islam, jesus, Jewish, lesbian, LGBT, Liberal, Muslim, Paul Knitter, pluralism, Queer, Randy Woodley, sex, sexuality, theology
9 comments
  Livefyre
  • Get Livefyre
  • FAQ
Sign in
+ Follow
Post comment
 
Link
Newest | Oldest
StephenJosephCorell
StephenJosephCorell 5pts

yeah, I am pretty sure the word used in John 3:16 to explain what Christ wanted to redeem is "world," not just "human beings." (can somebody help me with the original, untranslated word here?)  I think that it is a much more difficult and complex calling for some people to think about Christ's vision for the world as more than "we're leaving this place after we die", instead of thinking about the systemic injustices that we are participating in that affect the environment and the whole bio-sphere.

 

I don't know.  Maybe it's just easier?  Maybe it's the unfortunate by-product of escapist tendencies in Christian thought?  Maybe the harshness against her third point was because we are more anthropocentric than we like to believe? (guilty as charged, but I'm working on it). I don't know.  I'd love to hear from someone who disagrees with her to see why they responded the way they did, calling it a "slippery slope".  I don't really understand this criticism and I'd be interested to hear their reasoning.

malakhgabriel
malakhgabriel 5pts

I'm very happy to see people addressing how "LGBT" or even "LGBTQ" can lead to an erasure of trans people and trans voices. Thank you for talking about that. I do hope, though, that in the future you can use the word "transgender" and not "transgendered." One isn't "transgendered" by anything. "Transgendering" isn't something that happens. People are simply transgender.

 

Here's a decent article about the words: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joanne-herman/transgender-or-transgende_b_492922.html

BoSanders
BoSanders moderator 5pts

 @malakhgabriel Thank you for the very nice note! I was not aware of how the grammer was functioning there and will make efforts to correct that in the future :)

 

thanks for the comment and the link!  -Bo 

BrotherBartimaeus
BrotherBartimaeus 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

I happened upon this today and thought it germane. It comes from Tertullian's Concerning Prayer: All the angels pray. Every creature prays. Cattle and wild beasts pray and bend the knee. As they come from their barns and caves they look up to heaven and call out, lifting up their spirit in their own fashion. The birds too rise and lift themselves up to heaven: they open out their wings, instead of hands, in the form of a cross and give voice to what seems to be a prayer. David

Randall808
Randall808 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

I never saw myself as a fringe or frontier kind of person, but I'm going to be spending my last year in grad school (Seattle School of Theology & Psychology) doing some preliminary work on the development of a Christian sexual ethic that's relevant, healthy, and practical for today.

 

http://lonetomato808.wordpress.com/2012/07/27/370-damage-and-desire-part-four/

Diana Butler Bass
Diana Butler Bass 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

...and for the record, in the Christian tradition--saints, mystics, theologians alike--have listened to, talked with, and preached to animals.  

Diana Butler Bass
Diana Butler Bass 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

Ah, I wonder if the IRD has ever heard of St Francis?  

Carrie Nettles
Carrie Nettles 5pts

Don Flowers, I am reminded of the time you told me I could preach on anything...say anything...excepting the environment

Brian Brandsmeier
Brian Brandsmeier 5pts

The IRD is an extremist group. Perhaps we should just ignore them. Let's water the flowers and let God take care of the weeds.

Trackbacks

  1. A Silly, Sarcastic, & Sporged Out Nerd Out! says:
    August 9, 2012 at 11:47 am

    [...] and Defending Dianna Butler Bass and those non-human animals   [...]

Search

Subscribe via iTunes

 


Support the brew

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2013 ·Delicious Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in