• Home
  • About
  • Podcast Archive
  • Subscribe (RSS)
  • Subscribe (iTunes)
  • Deacons
  • Live Events
  • Advertise With Us

Homebrewed Christianity

Equipping grassroots theologians for creative thinking, engaging, and living.

Claremont School of Theology

You are here: Home / engaging / A funny thing happened on the way to Pentecost

A funny thing happened on the way to Pentecost

May 26, 2012 by Bo Sanders 26 Comments

Tomorrow is Pentecost Sunday in the liturgical calendar. As one who emerged from a charismatic evangelical background and is now employed at a mainline church, this is my favorite Sunday of the whole year!

Here are just 3 funny things about Pentecost Sunday:

Charismatics don’t celebrate it. Because the large majority of Pentecostal & Charismatic churches don’t follow the liturgical year, this Sunday goes unnoticed in any special way. It is just another rockin’ week of worship songs! I find that hilarious. When you exist in a context that does not observe Lent (or even Advent) then both Easter and Pentecost are just one more occasion for ‘feasting’. This is a glory theology and neither fasting nor waiting are on the menu (speaking in generalities).

It’s tough to be a Christian and get away from it. Reading the Bible as a white-westerner can cause disorientation and cognitive dissonance. In the Gospel of Mark, fully 65% of Jesus’ ministry was based around miracles, mostly healing and exorcism. If you are going to read the Bible, it is going to be tough to get around just how much time and effort the writers spend on this element of ministry. But if you are part of an educated (enlightenment) tradition that is primarily intellectual about faith … you may have never seen a miraculous healing, exorcism, or manifestation of God’s power. Most of things we call ‘answers to prayer’ are slightly amplified coincidence – like getting a job you applied for and were qualified for or finding it in your heart to forgive someone which brought about reconciliation.

Don’t get me wrong, I do think that those things are miraculous and answers to prayer. I just want to note that there might be a difference in intensity from what is recorded in the Book of Acts.

Africa, Asia and South America are foreign to us. We hear lots and lots of reports from the Southern Hemisphere about the explosion of Pentecostal and Charismatic (P&C) Signs and Wonders movements (S&W). Many are calling it ‘the Future of Christianity’. It is tough to argue with when you compare it to the decline in church attendance in Europe and N. America, the overly analytical and often paralyzed intellectual brand of church that is embarrassed at both the zeal and simplicity of the fundamentalist and evangelical branches of the family.

Here are my two hesitations about the southern hemisphere being the future of the church:

1) As many have noted, the latest turn in the P&C movement is one toward the ‘Prosperity Gospel’ and the wildly demonstrative ‘Signs & Wonders’ movement where the spectacular and the sensational are prized above all else! (including Biblical precedent). This is an ominous turn. I am deeply suspicious that with the rise of global capitalism, deregulated markets and multi-national corporations’ economic and environmental policies … the prosperity ‘blessing’ might be a one-generation phenomenon with a vicious cynical backlash waiting behind it. This bubble will burst and both the pain and disillusionment will be inconsolable.

2) ‘The weirder the better’ is an ugly mantra. I recently talked to a traveling Charismatic evangelist who was disappointed that his most recent rally did not have more pizzaz. Sure good things happened and people reported both salvations, significant personal growth (like forgiveness) and a couple of minor healing (anorexia, etc.) But nothing really demonstrative or spectacular. That is not the part that caught my attention (I am used to that). It was the reasoning behind it.

“ If you come from a background where you have never seen Signs & Wonders then you are less likely for it to happen to you. Seeing it happen creates something in you – a faith or an openness – that allows God to do it with you.”

I was stunned. Did he really just say that if you have never seen it, that it is less likely to happen? Well, actually that makes a lot of sense. If you have never seen someone be ‘slain in the Spirit’ then you may be less likely to go to the ground when prayed for (ever heard of ‘carpet time’?).  This is where testimony and teaching are SO valuable.

Now the funny thing is that this dear minister has no idea that I have Lindbeck & MacIntyre ringing in my head like alarm bells at a fire station! I wanted to say ‘Language not only helps us interpret experience … our language helps create our experience.”

Those two things – the Prosperity turn in the South and the awareness of language/experience – are the two things that keep me from being 100% stoked about the future of Pentecost.   – Bo Sanders

_______

If you would like to read an interesting book on the subject, check out Philip Jenkins’ The New Faces of Christianity: Believing the Bible in the Global South 

  • Share on Facebook.
  • Share on Twitter.
Filed Under: engaging, latest, post-something, thinking Tagged With: Acts 2, Africa, Asia, book, books, Capitalism, church, future, Global South, God, Holy Spirit, jesus, Latin America, Pentecost, Philip Jenkins, prosperity, South American, theology
24 comments
  Livefyre
  • Get Livefyre
  • FAQ
Sign in
+ Follow
Post comment
 
Link
Newest | Oldest
willhenderson
willhenderson 5pts

Couple of thoughts as an Emergent Progressive who is still Ordained in the Assemblies of God, one of the largest Pentecostal denomination in America.  (I realize I may not be ordained for long but hey :-)

 

1.  I hear people mix Pentecostals & Charismatics all the time but in my experience, as someone who has preached all over the US, but they are really different.  I don't know one Charismatic who would claim Pentecostal.  They like to infiltrate Pentecostal churches & take over their worship cause they have more people and nicer bigger buildings but they stick with the name Charismatic.

 

2.  Most AG churches I have been around DO celebrate Pentecost Sunday, though I've never heard of a Charismatic one doing that.

 

3.  In its simplest form, to be Pentecostal is to focus on being filled with the Spirit.  Many AG churches don't even talk about tongues anymore.  To be Charismatic you are focused on ALL the gifts (which is the reason true Charismatics don't like Pentecostals cause they think they don't have as much FLASH by having it all.  I think Classical Pentecostals have been who they have been with a focus on the Holy Spirit & upward.  Charismatics have been more focused on the body & community of believers thru making sure everyone has gifts.

 

Finally there are many Evangelicals churches that take in parts of either of these.  Usually what is imported into a church which is not theologically technically Pentecostal or Charismatic is the Charismatic part.  You don't hear Pentecostalism spreading much outside its gates.  Charismatics though are in almost every denomination in some form.  Pentecostal denominations get bigger from this.  Charismatics seem to like to move from church to church where the is the most signs & wonders.

 

My problem with Charismatics is that I think they have contributed little to the kingdom in a healthy way.  My problem with Pentecostals is that they have put the Holy Spirit in a box.  Believe me when I speak in a Charismatic church you know you're gonna see some crazy stuff.  When I preach at Assemblies of God churches or others that are actually theologically Pentecostal you can't tell the difference from them & a dry evangelical church.  They got the Holy Spirit so boxed up NOTHING happens.

 

So one, the Charismatics, want no control.  Anything goes.  So people get hurt.  And Bo is right, the Prosperity gospel & the name it claim it stuff is all over.

 

The other, Pentecostals, want ALL control.  Nothing goes that doesn't fit in the box.  People don't really get to experience the Holy Spirit at all.  In Pentecostal churches I've never personally seen any prosperity gospel.  Just like the Methodist church could say they are not what John Wesley started, so could the AG.  Most AG churches you would have NO idea that they were Pentecostal or Charismatic.

 

I've been in Pentecostal & Charismatic churches in both South America & Africa & China & Thailand.  Only in South America (Argentina) did it seem like they were one & the same.  Which meant both ANYTHING GOES & THEY WANT ALL THE CONTROL.  Actually that probably makes them in the worst case scenario.  Now I don't have any experience with the Black Pentecostal churches but for all the 100's & 100's I've spoken in.  They are flat dead.  NOTHING is going on in them.

 

All that to say.  The Pentecostal church is either dead or or close.  The Charismatics are all about seeing a burning bush every church service or personal prophecy or prosperity.  Going to church is about seeing signs & wonders so think of the pressure on the pastors to produce or otherwise GOD DIDN'T SHOW UP!

 

So I think Pentecostals don't help anyone cause God is in a box & Charismatics hurt people with fake things & personal prophecy, which i have personally seen really hurt people many times.  I don't find any reason to be in the AG anymore cause its not contributing to the Kingdom.  I don't want to be in the charismatic churches cause all I feel they are doing is wreaking havoc in the church.

 

But one thing in all these countries ..... Pentecostals & Charismatics are worse than here.  More dead in Pentecostal circles and more crazy in Charismatic ones.  I was in a charismatic church in Buenos Aires & the front looked like a rugby scrum.  Made Benny Hinn look conservative & gentle.  It was insane.

 

I hold on to the world Pentecostal because I want to still build my faith around the Holy Spirit, but I'm not theologically aligned or would agree with much of their theology.  I'm not sure if it can totally be redeemed or not but for now I'm trying at least.  At least it was a feast & its when he Spirit first came.  Charismatics don't have a feast or anything.  To me probably neither word is redeemable but I'm trying with the former.

willhenderson
willhenderson 5pts

One more thing proving my point that they are different is Bethel in Redding.

 

They were in the Assemblies of God.  They began over time to be more Charismatic.  Finally they were like we really just want to be Charismatic and found NO ROOM in the AG for them. 

 

I got the feeling when all this happened (I heard allot cause I had friends on both sides) that they really had no room for each other.  Bethel thought the AG was dead (possibly so) and the AG thought Bethel was out of control (cause they like control)  Bethel couldn't be charismatic AND AG and the AG really didn't want that weirdness as they put it in their official stance apart of the AG.

 

When it comes down to it the two don't mix & are very different.  And reflecting on my South American visits perhaps the AG down there is just Charismatic & not Pentecostal at all.  Which the more I think about it is possible.

 

Classic Pentecostalism wants to be filled with the Spirit to reach the world (catch is IF you are filled with the Spirit you have to speak in tongues)  Classic Charismatic circles don't care if you speak in tongues they focus on signs & wonders and want to see everything and every gift.

 

We had one charismatic church actually gather the congregation when they took the love offering for us dance around us like a witch circle.  They were wildly kicking and screaming & I was trying to protect my girls :-)  It was insane.  They started speaking words of nonsense over us & I think we almost got a speeding ticket leaving town.  Odd side note the offering was the lowest of the year.   mmmmm :-)

AlbertoMedrano
AlbertoMedrano 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

I'm a Pentecostal (well, according to my twitter profile, I consider myself a progressive Pentecostal) and I fully agree with your 3 "funny things" and 2 "hesitations". However, as for your hesitations, those are my criticisms. The prosperity gospel, I believe, in time will have a negative impact on the future of pentecostalism. It makes me angry every time my and I hear a preacher preach on it, a book comes out the church raves over, and when poor people give all that they have. It's manipulative, an abuse of power, and demonic. 

 

And oh the zeal. For most charismatics, every Sunday is Pentecostal Sunday! Ha ha! I think this kind of spirit of zeal is what gives Pentecostals their flavor. But! A belief that the more spiritually bold one is the more faith that one has, and the more something spiritual will happen and the more meaningful is so much wrong as it is just ridiculous. There is a difference between zeal and weird. I call the weird folks in my stream charismaniacs. 

 

My hope is that the prosperity gospel and the weirdness, the abuse of power and persuasion, will soon disappear and the general public will know Pentecostals as those who believe in the "super"-natural of which helps bring the disenfranchised, the poor, the outcasts of society into complete whole-ness. I do believe it will happen. And that's why I believe Pentecostalism is the future of the church. Just a new kind of pentecostalism.

willhenderson
willhenderson 5pts

 @AlbertoMedrano 

Very good.  I agree with most all of what you are saying.  Especially the end about what Pentecostals should be doing with the disenfranchised, the poor, the outcasts of society from brokenness to wholeness!

 

I still don't think that Pentecostal & Charismatic, either theologically or experientially are the same.  Like I said there are some Charismatics in many places, including in Pentecostal churches.  But the very nature of the two theologically are very different.

 

I would also agree with you that for Charismatics every sunday is pentecost sunday.  That is what I meant when i said they come looking for the burning bush every week & Pastors are under great stress to provide.

 

Churches that are Theologically Pentecostal, who have no Charismatics inside, are for the most part dead even though most I've been around DO celebrate Pentecost Sunday.

 

Great thoughts!!!!  THE NEW KIND OF PENTECOSTALISM  :-)

jb00m
jb00m 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

Its something I am concerned with too. A couple years ago when I was in Ecuador, the family I was living with were Pentecostal...mostly. There were some pretty crazy/neat stories with just their family. One son was freed from alcoholism and then went to the rainforest to pray, eventually hearing a calling to be a pastor. That was pretty baffling for me to understand (coming from an enlightenment intellectual tradition). But while I don't have Lindbeck or MacIntyre in my mind, I do have Cassirer who makes a similar argument. 

 

My Spanish skills were in development (well, still are) while I was there, so I didn't understand everything that was being said, so I can't say if it was prosperity gospel or not. But, there did seem to be more of an emphasis on freedom (but I don't mean anything like the equation: money = power = independence = freedom) and things like that, praying/singing the psalms, laments, anointing, and plain ol' praises. Possibly this was mostly because it was a very small church in a small city, attended mostly by poor, indigenous, farmers. With that group, who, politically have been very powerful in the last number of years, the promise of prosperity seems to be viewed as very suspect. But, freedom from addiction, which allows you to make your living more or less in peace, that's good news. That's also in a place where a community dynamic is very strong as well.

 

But then, there is the issue of language...and probably half or more of the people attending that church cannot read or write. My host mom, for example, could only write her name. She had a Bible, but had her husband (when he was around- he often works away from the community) or daughter or granddaughter read to her. Other women from the community took a literacy class put on by one of the teachers from the school, and there were many. I think this is probably at play as well: they do not have much control over the language. 

BoSanders
BoSanders moderator 5pts

 @jb00m It is impossible to say how much I appreciated your post.  I would comment ... except that you have given my so much to think about.   I would love to hear more reflections (as I think through this topic more).  -Bo (anEverydayTheology@gmail.com)  

trippfuller
trippfuller moderator 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

"I am deeply suspicious that with the rise of global capitalism, deregulated markets and multi-national corporations’ economic and environmental policies … the prosperity ‘blessing’ might be a one-generation phenomenon with a vicious cynical backlash waiting behind it.".... well Bo I bet there are some other christian traditions that have a theology that keeps them from questioning global capitalism...I just can't think of any lol

JonoChild
JonoChild 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

As one who lives in the South (South Africa) and has travelled/and lived quite extensively in the rest of Southern Africa - Pentecostilsm is the predominant believe system in poorer communities, while a watered down, consumer conservative Charismatic system is the craze in your more educated and wealthier areas.

I am a recovering Charismatic who has changed the way in which he believes, but am deeply concerned at this belief system and its inability to tackle systemic issues in the South, while continuing to build there own empires of sheltered unaware people. The every Sunday is Pentecost is what I was apart of for many years, but it became increasingly problematic how this led to escapist hedonism.

 

I look forward to the day where one can hold to the miraculous (not supernatural - Bo!), use ones brain, be open to various interpretations and be a people willing to love and speak & live prophetically within the system for issues such as Race, Poverty, Aids etc.

BoSanders
BoSanders moderator 5pts

 @JonoChild Thank you SO much for wading in on this!  Your take is encouraging to us (in scope) and challenging to us (in perspective).  I would LOVE to hear more from you on this topic.  If you would be interested, type up a report of your experience and we will post it.  I think that would be fascinating!!   Thanks again for the feedback - you have my brain buzzing about what this looks like over there.  -Bo (anEverydayTheology@gmail.com)  

JonoChild
JonoChild 5pts

 @BoSanders Will do so. Might take a while as I am in the middle of my capitalist Graduate Degree in Accounting which steals my time and soul, but shall do it.

LucasLand
LucasLand 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

Interesting post Bo. The claim that you are skeptical about the South being the future of the church seems out of place in the context of your post on Pentecost and pentecostals. The South is much more than pentecostals. So, perhaps you meant that pentecostals are not the future simply because of its growth in the South. Even so, the global South still seems like the future if only because it is the majority of the world's population.

BoSanders
BoSanders moderator 5pts

 @LucasLand I surely appreciate your comment! I had to skip a couple of steps (given the 500 word limit that I try to hold to for blog posts) and you found one. What I should have pointed out was the commonly reported stat that Pentecostalism is A) the fastest growing branch of Christianity in the world B) that it is the largest contingent of Christians in the Southern Hemisphere.  Thank you for pointing out that this is not the whole picture. Having said that, if A & B are true (by every measure) then my short cut of simplifying 'the South' is both acceptable and admittedly limited. I thank you for the clarification! Your caution is MUCH appreciated.  -Bo I will be more nuanced and specific in the future (it is worth the extra words) 

LucasLand
LucasLand 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @BoSanders If your theory that the "prosperity gospel" will sort of backfire in the South is true, then the question is what will replace it. Or maybe it won't be as monolithic as pentecostalism seems to be now. I lived in Bolivia for a year recently and the Latin American context is very different than the African or Asian, which is obvious. Liberation theology is still alive and well in many parts of Latin America. The rise of leftist governments there and the persistence of the Catholic church make it a unique context.This is not meant to be a critique of you in particular, but I wonder if we (privileged westerners) sometimes make generalizations about the rest of the world because it is so foreign to us as you point out. You're right that by all accounts A & B are true, but that is not the whole story, which we have already agreed. I discovered when I got to Bolivia that I had painted the story of Latin America in very broad strokes even as a progressive. Then I found out that it was way more complex than I had imagined. I thought "Evo Morales, the first indigenous president in S America, must be loved by all." Come to find out his government is very problematic in its assumptions about development and how it fails to represent all of the indigenous groups equally.I think we are soon going to have to wrestle with the South politically,  economically and theologically, because we (USA) will no longer be able to sustain our control in these parts of the world. P.S. Sorry for going somewhat off on a tangent from the topic of your post. I could say more about my own journey through charismatic churches. Also, don't get too nuanced or you'll end up writing posts no one will read. I appreciate you trying to find a good balance though. 

LucasLand
LucasLand 5pts

 @BoSanders On the flip side, there is something useful in making some generalizations (with caveats of course). A & B are also true to some extent in Latin America and globally we have to wrestle with the rise of pentecostalism in the South. Generalizations help us with some broad strokes to ask important questions on a larger scale. If we insisted on only speaking contextually, we would not be able to say much. I'm not sure exactly where we draw the line, but somewhere between the two or in light of each other. Thanks for stimulating good thoughts!

BoSanders
BoSanders moderator 5pts

 @LucasLand as a Soccer (Football) fan and a Contextual Theologian, you gracious point is well taken. I am aware that Bolivia is a different from Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay as N.America is from 'Africa'. [I actually wrote a piece called 'There is no such thing as Asian' based on Edward Said]. 

I even cringe to use the designation of 'the South' in any meaningful way. All of that is to say that you are right - my comments about the 'Prosperity Gospel' bubble burst were more African in reference (and countries in Asia to a lesser degree). Thank you for being kind in pointing that out!  -Bo  

sean muldowney
sean muldowney 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

In my 10 years or so as a Christian, I've been quick to run from Charismatic weirdness. Even though I had my conversion experience in an AoG church, I found my home with Plymouth Brethren shortly after (talk about ends of the spectrum, huh?). After a few recent years identifying as a fairly typical Evangelical, I've found myself thirsting for intimacy and encounter with God. Seminary at a C&MA school has challenged me to go after genuine Pentecost 'stuff' while staying grounded/balanced in the love and compassion of Jesus (thus forsaking weirdness & authoritarianism that often accompanies this thing.

 

And usually I'm one who uses the notion of "balance" as an excuse not to stretch my faith at times, but in this realm I find that balance very necessary.

BoSanders
BoSanders moderator 5pts

 @Sean Patrck Interesting take ....   he is the one suggestion I might make - IF by balance you mean 'not too much' of anything, that can lead to passivity.  IF instead you mean 'integrated into a  holistic approach' than it is not timidity but a healthy balance.   whatcha think? 

BoSanders
BoSanders moderator 5pts

 @Sean Patrck YES !  what I meant was to PUSH into everything in order to bring balance - not tinker in stuff. Don't be passive about balance (and thus not challenge ourselves) but be aggressive in exploration in order to broaden ourselves and bring balance ;)   -Bo   

sean muldowney
sean muldowney 5pts

 @BoSanders That's precisely the journey I'm on - learning to identify the difference btw. passive (choose from the buffet) & integrated/holistic spirituality. 

 

...and wow, I spelled my own name wrong.

Travis Mamone
Travis Mamone 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

I come from a charismatic background, too. For my old charismatic church, EVERY Sunday was Pentecost Sunday! In fact, one Sunday the pastor sang a song to an old widow as if her dead husband was singing it to her. That's when I knew, "I gotta get the f*ck outta here!"

BoSanders
BoSanders moderator 5pts

 @Travis Mamone You are 100% right about every Sunday being Pentecost Sunday!!!  Hilarious.  

but that story you just told is creepy as hell.  -Bo 

brianleport
brianleport 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

Bo,

 

I am concerned about the future of the global church in this regard as well. Pentecostalism in a North American context (like all other Christian groups) resonates with some and discourages others. I walked away from Pentecostalism very discouraged. It has taken many years to recover an appreciation for various elements (mostly motivated by the reality that all groups have serious problems). Maybe the future of global Christianity is not Pentecostalism, but something post-Pentecostal. 

BoSanders
BoSanders moderator 5pts

 @brianleport I really like your grounded take on this. I have a whole research thing going on behind the scenes (extra-caricular) for what it might mean to be post-pentecostal in a pluralistic and globalized context ;)  - let's keep comparing note Brian!  -Bo 

brianleport
brianleport 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @BoSanders Good idea!

Trackbacks

  1. Pentecost Sunday 2012 « Near Emmaus says:
    May 27, 2012 at 7:16 am

    [...] Sanders, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Pentecost Share this:TwitterFacebookLinkedInStumbleUponRedditDiggPinterestTumblrEmailPrintLike this:LikeBe [...]

  2. Dealing with Demons (a progressive take) says:
    June 4, 2012 at 8:14 am

    [...] Sanders Leave a Comment In the past two week of Pentecost I have posted 2 blogs about the Bible (A Funny Thing Happened and Poetics)  and then 2 about personal prophecy (Why didn’t God tell me? and Process). I love [...]

Search

Subscribe via iTunes

 


Support the brew

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2013 ·Delicious Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in