• Home
  • About
  • Podcast Archive
  • Subscribe (RSS)
  • Subscribe (iTunes)
  • Deacons

Homebrewed Christianity

Equipping grassroots theologians for creative thinking, engaging, and living.

You are here: Home / thinking / I Survived the Christian Right: Lesson 6

I Survived the Christian Right: Lesson 6

February 22, 2010 by Michael Camp 1 Comment

I Survived the Christian Right: Ten Lessons I Learned on My Journey Home

Lesson 6
Have Sensible Sex

By now, I’m sure some have declared me a full-fledged heretic. Brace yourself, there’s more. Now for something totally uncomfortable…the subject of religion and sex. In my experience, with some noble exceptions (there are some excellent evangelical marriage manuals on sex), the evangelical church has largely been sex-negative, in other words, either it has suppressed open discussion or portrayal of sex for fear of promoting immorality, or it has condemned certain sexual behaviors, from nudity to masturbation to oral sex to all pre-marital sex, based on misinterpretations of the Bible.31

My historical studies reveal today’s church views on sex have more to do with Greco-Roman Platonism and Augustine’s warped perspective…despite his wisdom on other topics…than a rational reading of scripture. For instance, the Jewish tradition from which Christianity arose was sex affirming. Correspondingly, contrary to popular belief, the Greco-Roman world, in which the early church grew, was not wholly a debauched sexual culture. The sex-negating Platonists and Stoics, who had fearful attitudes toward “irrational” sexual pleasure, influenced much of it.32 This had impact on early church fathers like Augustine.

One specific is how these sex-negative Greco-Roman values influenced the English translation of the Greek New Testament word porneia. Raymond Lawrence calls it “perhaps the most deliberately mistranslated word in the biblical literature,”33 when it is rendered “fornication,” and I would argue when it is also translated “sexual immorality” (as in ‘flee sexual immorality’34). Conservative Biblicists have condemned a host of sexual behaviors under that one word, commonly summing it up as perverted sex or all sex outside of monogamous marriage, without understanding what it meant to the original audience. One scholar believes a better translation is “harlotry,”35 for the connotation of porneia is selling oneself to break covenant. Moreover, it is not always about sex, as is evidenced by the times it or its Hebrew equivalent is translated as “idolatry.”

Despite the fact that I would never endorse polygamy as a good idea, the fact is polygamy is never condemned in the Bible nor is monogamy strictly endorsed. In fact, the Torah commands polygamy in the case of the Leverite law36 and supports it at times.37 Polygamy and concubinage were practiced by Old Testament heroes of the faith from Abraham to Jacob to Gideon to David and never censured by God, except excessive polygamy with foreign women outside the faith. The truth is that if Bathsheba had not been married to Uriah, David would not have committed adultery. The biblical literature defines adultery differently than we do in our modern context.38

Likewise with pre-marital sex, the Bible puts limitations on it because of the Jewish concern for pure lineage and because unmarried women were considered property of their fathers. There was no equivalent of today’s single woman, living outside her family’s home. Therefore, the Bible does not specifically condemn all singles sexuality.39

This is not to say that we should emulate the male-dominated society of the Bible or married men have license to run out and grab the first single, pretty woman they see bathing on a rooftop (how David first saw Bathsheba). Promiscuity rooted in selfish, personal gratification cannot be defended. However, it does mean, if we are honest, that we should take the above facts into account when we decide on a sexual ethic for today.

In sex, let the admonitions to love one another, treat each other kindly, and be responsible in our relationships, be the guiding principal, not absolutist rules that were never a part of the Bible’s historical and cultural milieu.

[31] Thelos, Philo, Divine Sex: Liberating Sex from Religious Tradition

[32] Lawrence, Raymond, The Poisoning of Eros

[33] Lawrence, Raymond, Op. cit., page 2

[34] I Corinthians 6:18

[35] Countryman, William, Dirt, Greed, and Sex

[36] Deuteronomy 25:5-10

[37] Deuteronomy 21:15-17

[38] Countryman, Op. cit., page 159

[39] Countryman, Op. cit., page 264.

Share
Filed Under: thinking

Comments

  1. Jo Ann W. Goodson says:
    February 22, 2010 at 4:40 pm

    “In sex, let the admonitions to love one another, treat each other kindly, and be responsible in our relationships, be the guiding principal, not absolutist rules that were never a part of the Bible’s historical and cultural milieu.” I never thought that I would see this statement in this type of context but I am pleased that it is here. We have made sex a dirty word, especially in Christian churches. How can something that God gave us as a gift be seen as ugly, nasty, and a no-no with the exception of having sex to create children. The key word for me has always been LOVE not simply sexual gratification. Most of the LGBT community cannot marry in the US and some Christians would condem them to celibacy. In my opinion that is wrong, both not allowing marriage and expecting them to remain celibate all of their lives. Two people very much in love and in a commited relationship should have the freedom to be sexual in their love making if they so desire. To me it is no other persons decision to make, it is the couples right and priviledge to decide for themselves without judgement. For me this relationship must include love, trust, respect and all decisions made concerning sexual activity should be agreed upon by the two partners. Nothing should be forced. I also believe that sexual education on what sexual acts are considered to be very loving and desirable should be pursued by every couple. So many people have no idea what “good” loving sex would be like, thus the need for education. Life together can be so much more fulfilling if this area of a couples life was entered into with love and knowledge. So many couples enter into a relationship with no knowledge what so ever of sex and can permanently destroy a good relationship with the wrong ideas about sexuality and the sexual acts. Loving their own bodies and the body of their partner is so important. A loving touch can bring a couple so much closer to each other. Being together in sexual activity can make them “as one body.” We must first love and respect our own body before we can love and respect anothers. What God made is beautiful and is GOOD.

Speak Your Mind Cancel reply

*

*

Search

Support the brew

The latest

  • Occupy Theology: Marx and Whitehead
  • Bananas, Bullies and the Bible – you can’t start in the middle
  • Women you’ll Want to Read
  • LIVE EVENT with John Caputo February 12!! Limited Seats!!
  • Check Out My Visit to Church Next…a sweet video podcast
  • Ready for the Road Trip? process prep

Transforming Christian Theology

The Homebrewed Hosting Service

Host Unlimited Domains on 1 Account Happy Holidays! Download a FREE audiobook today!

Friends

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2012 · Delicious Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Podcast powered by podPress v8.8.10.13