• Home
  • About
  • Podcast Archive
  • Subscribe (RSS)
  • Subscribe (iTunes)
  • Deacons

Homebrewed Christianity

Equipping grassroots theologians for creative thinking, engaging, and living.

You are here: Home / thinking / I Survived the Christian Right: Lesson 4

I Survived the Christian Right: Lesson 4

February 15, 2010 by Michael Camp 3 Comments

I Survived the Christian Right: Ten Lessons I Learned on My Journey Home

Lesson 4
Don’t Be Deluded by the Last Days

As a brand-new believer in 1979 I tended to accept the pre-tribulation Rapture view that the Bible predicts Jesus would return a second time before a period of tribulation, to whisk believers up to heaven and leave unbelievers behind to face seven years of apocalyptic trials. After reading several critiques of this view, I realized it was farcical and unbiblical18, not to mention highly manipulative the way preachers or authors…Hal Lindsey in the 70s and 80s and Tim LaHaye (Left Behind) today…use it to “persuade” people to come to Christ, or else. Despite this, like the majority of evangelicals, I still believed the return of Christ was in the future and possibly eminent, given the state of the world.

Then around 1999, the preterists19 entered my life; the likes of R.C. Sproul, Gary DeMar, and Kenneth Gentry, ironically conservative evangelicals who introduced the notion that everything that Jesus predicted in the Olivet Discourse (Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21) was fulfilled between 64 and 70 AD.20 They also viewed the speculation around the return of Christ as madness21 and the book of Revelation as written prior to 70 AD;22 hence its predictions were not speaking about thousands of years in the future.

Their reasoning was refreshing. They cried Bible abuse by dispensationalists and the bulk of evangelicals in the widespread unreasonable belief that Jesus spoke of two events in the Olivet Discourse: a coming calamity on Jerusalem within a generation, and then in the next breath about his return to earth 2000 years in the future. After reading the preterists, I reread all those prophetic verses and suddenly they made perfect sense.23

What I didn’t expect was to come to believe these preterists weren’t going far enough. Considered “partial preterists,” they still believe in a future return of Christ at the time of the resurrection. But for this position to stand, there must be two second comings of Christ, one in 70 AD in judgment on Jewish Temple worship and one at a future resurrection. But this view is problematic because the New Testament does not speak of two second comings at all, or more accurately, a third coming. I found myself agreeing with the “consistent preterists,”24 who say that all the prophecies about Jesus returning occurred at or before 70 AD based on a rational reading of the New Testament and first century historical evidence.25

Imagine that for a moment. Jesus has already returned. The drama is over. There is no need to unmask the mystery or fear the Antichrist, let alone shape American foreign policy around the return of Christ and the end of the world.

Get on with the business of saving the planet and promoting social justice in the world without secretly believing it will all be for naught in the end.

[18] DeMar, Gary, Last Days Madness: The Obsession of the Modern Church

[19] Preterists believe biblical events were fulfilled in the past as opposed to futurists, who believe they will be fulfilled in the future.

[20] Sproul, R.C., The Last Days According to Jesus, and Josephus, The Jewish Wars

[21] DeMar, Gary, Op. cit.

[22] Gentry, Kenneth, Jr., Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the Book of Revelation

[23] e.g. Jesus said, “I tell you the truth, this generation shall certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.” Matthew 24:34 and “The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place.” Revelation 1:1

[24] J. Stuart Russell, The Parousia, and www.preterist.org

[25] Josephus, Tacitus, and Eusebius. They cite occurrences of false prophets, famines, earthquakes, wars, and astronomical signs leading up to 70 AD that match what Jesus predicted.

Share
Filed Under: thinking
Sign in
Livefyre logo
  • Comment help
  • Get Livefyre
Post comment as
twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Michael Camp

Chyristina, Great comments on all the posts. Thanks. This short blurb on this lesson doesn't do it justice, I know. I go into more details in my book. There are two issues that I think make this an important lesson. One, the way the Bible has been abused (mostly by the Christian Right) to promote one of the silliest and ungrounded interpretations I have heard (the pre-trib rapture with spaceship Jesus coming to rescue believers), and to a lesser degree, the notion that the return of Christ is imminent today. Historically, this has been a major embarrassment for Christendom (tons of false predictions throughout the centuries) and continues to be. If you study some of the books I cite, it becomes clear that the NT's original audience (and authors) did not expect Jesus to return in the way or the time the evangelical church has insisted. Everyone (including Jesus) put this "coming" as a imminent occurrence within a generation of Christ. The church is reading into the NT something that is not there. The second thing answers your question. The evangelical church has used the teaching of the Second Coming in a deplorable way by tying it to evangelism and imploring people to "accept Christ" to be ready for (or escape) the coming tribulation (manipulation comes to mind), and also tying it to politics, missions, and social justice. e.g. shaping American foreign policy around the return of Christ and the end of the world, declaring that if we can hasten the return of Christ if we just supported missions more, and promoting an attitude of screw the world, it's fading away and Jesus is coming soon. Read some of the books I cite for details.

share
  • spam
  • offensive
  • disagree
  • off topic
Like
Chyristina Brown

I agree with the last statement - but everything in between seems like a lot of speculation. Whether you believe in a pre-trib, post-trib, mid-trib, preterist, or futerist view of the book of Revelations, the fact remains - The present is all I have. I'm not entirely following your rationale linking this particular worldview to the "Christian Right." Why would anyone be required to be saved from this view?

share
  • spam
  • offensive
  • disagree
  • off topic
Like
Jo Ann W. Goodson

"Get on with the business of saving the planet and promoting social justice in the world without secretly believing it will all be for naught in the end." I really do agree with this statement. Do not think we should drop all conversation on the subject but for me I am "getting on with the business" and not worrying about the future. It is all speculative anyway. I will hope and pray for a better tomorrow and continue to do whatever I can with God's help. Trusting in God for my future.

share
  • spam
  • offensive
  • disagree
  • off topic
Like

Search

Support the brew

The latest

  • Fully Human, Fully Divine, & All Process! Christology with John Cobb
  • John Cobb & Tom Oord go Emerging with Jesus
  • Pastors Should Follow Obama & Stop Evolving!
  • Why the Church of N. America will always be (mostly) like it is
  • Dressing up in Justice! Looking for the Reign of God!
  • Get Lost in Order to be Saved! John Caputo on Radical Theology

Transforming Christian Theology

The Homebrewed Hosting Service

Host Unlimited Domains on 1 Account Happy Holidays! Download a FREE audiobook today!

Friends

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2012 · Delicious Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Podcast powered by podPress v8.8.10.13