• Home
  • About
  • Podcast Archive
  • Subscribe (RSS)
  • Subscribe (iTunes)
  • Deacons

Homebrewed Christianity

Equipping grassroots theologians for creative thinking, engaging, and living.

You are here: Home / thinking / How Open is God?

How Open is God?

November 23, 2009 by Tripp Fuller 5 Comments

My friend Mike Morrell asked the question last week, ‘Is God a Recovering Practitioner of Violence?‘ and on top of being a very heretical edgy post he brought up the whole Open Theism debate.  At that very same scroll through the blog reader I saw the first posts from Tom Oord who decided to lay down the core themes of Open Theism, so Mike here you go.  For all you Deacons I have a question for you….how open is God?

God’s primary characteristic is love.

Theology involves humble speculation about who God truly is and what God really does.

Creatures – at least humans – are genuinely free to make choices pertaining to their salvation.

God experiences others in some way analogous to how creatures experience others.

Both creatures and God are relational beings, which means that both God and creatures are affected by others in give-and-take relationships.

God’s experience changes, yet God’s nature or essence is unchanging.

God created all nondivine things.

God takes calculated risks, because God is not all-controlling.

Creatures are called to act in loving ways that please God and make the world a better place.

The future is open; it is not predetermined or fully known by God.

God’s expectations about the future are often partly dependent upon creaturely actions.

Although everlasting, God experiences time in a way analogous to how creatures experience time.

Share
Filed Under: thinking

Comments

  1. deacon burrley says:
    November 23, 2009 at 5:45 am

    I am feeling very open. Oords blog is sweet.

  2. Jo Ann W. Goodson says:
    November 24, 2009 at 8:38 am

    Oord makes statements that I agree with.

  3. Dave Blair says:
    November 24, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    Hmmm….a lesser god of sorts…sort of a “kinder, gentler” demiurge maybe? A wanna-be goody two shoes god who eternally proceeds from an emination of Ayn Sof once removed? A deity in training or in purgatory? Well, If he’s talking about the incarnate second person of the Trinity, I’m with him. If he’s talking about THE TRINITY, I’m not.

  4. Blake Huggins says:
    November 25, 2009 at 9:24 am

    This business about whether God’s nature or essence changes over time or our perception of God’s revelation in history changes is a live question for me. If we maintain that God’s primary characteristic is love — and not a bunch of other characteristics bequeathed to us by Greek metaphysics — then I suppose there is room for God’s nature to be unchangeable but God’s experience always changing and in process.

    I don’t know though. That’s still a puzzle to me.

Trackbacks

  1. Brannon Howse Warns That Emergents Are Actually Communistic Atheists « The Online Discernmentalist Mafia says:
    November 25, 2009 at 10:08 pm

    [...] is why ye must avoid those evil Emergent heretics: Iggy, Tripp Fuller, The Groundworks, Mike Morrell and [...]

Speak Your Mind Cancel reply

*

*

Search

Support the brew

The latest

  • Check Out My Visit to Church Next…a sweet video podcast
  • Ready for the Road Trip? process prep
  • Clarifying the Quadrilateral
  • There is no Evangelical Orthodoxy
  • Postmodern Youth Ministry Under the Influence…
  • Theology Nerds Are Sexy…the shirt

Transforming Christian Theology

The Homebrewed Hosting Service

Host Unlimited Domains on 1 Account Happy Holidays! Download a FREE audiobook today!

Friends

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2012 · Delicious Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Podcast powered by podPress v8.8.10.12