• Home
  • About
  • Podcast Archive
  • Subscribe (RSS)
  • Subscribe (iTunes)
  • Deacons

Homebrewed Christianity

Equipping grassroots theologians for creative thinking, engaging, and living.

You are here: Home / 2009 / Archives for May 2009

Transforming Theology w/ Denominational Leaders pt. 2

May 29, 2009 by Tripp Fuller 1 Comment

This session was much less depressing.  Real things were said.  Honest things.

What we need:

- ‘Entrepreneurial apostolic leaders!  That is what we need for the future.

- We need an alternative public witness to the religious right, because…..the gospel is bigger and more beautiful than what is seen today.

- Global economic downturn forces the church to make dramatic changes that we should have made years ago.  This a a karios movement.

‘The fundamental perception is that Christianity as it is is unhelpful to the spiritual journey of most people.  Christianity exists culturally as a relic.  How will we convince people we have anything to contribute to their life?’, Barry Taylor

We need to get away from the idea of a possible moment where a Rauschenbusch and Neibuhr will reappear as a dominate voice in the public square.

We sound like a group of leaders trying to convince congregations to sign on to our agenda of social justice instead of investing and joining the best of our people in the grassroots.

How do we handle the captivity of our institutions to the market place?  How do we look to the future, a future without privledge, surplus…, and not be greived but hopeful and energized? How do we invite our people to embrace the cross if we don’t have a resurrection to tell them about?

We need to name the real death of the denominations as they exist, really greive, and then be Chriistian and look for resurrection.  We don’t do Christ a favor by keeping institutions on life support that need to die.  Many of us act as if the form of Christianity we really love and work in is the Christian faith, we act as if our way of being the church is the church.  If that is true the church is dieing just like GM.  If it isn’t true then we are being poor stewards of the life of the church.

The client for the church, our denominations, our seminaries is the gift we have been given by God, the gospel.

How are we going to fund the good creative work that is being done and let the unnecessary things fall along the wayside?

Share
Filed Under: living

Rediscovering the Bible in Community with Tim Conder: Homebrewed Christianity 52

May 28, 2009 by Chad Crawford 3 Comments

conder1The hermeneutics train keeps rolling this week with Tim Conder, founding pastor of Emmaus Way in Durham, North Carolina. Tim talks about his new book, Free for All, about approaching biblical interpretation as a community of faith.

Here’s a taste:

The Bible, especially in times of great culture change, but always, the Bible is in need of liberation, and so we’re trying to demonstrate how God’s Spirit works in dramatic ways when a community is tasked with not just being passive listeners but co-interpreters and co-creators with whatever authority shapes their fellowship.

You bring a bias to the text. And where those biases become dangerous is when they’re not identified.

One of the ways that we have a liberated reading of the text is to acknowledge our biases and to create diversity of voices so that those biases are balanced out.

Free for All: Rediscovering the Bible in Community by Tim Conder with Daniel Rhodes is available for pre-order and is due out August 1.

Also from Tim: The Church in Transition: The Journey of Existing Churches into Emerging Culture

Check out the Emmaus Way Podcast

As you’ve come to expect, we also have a little fun with some of our Homebrewed Christianity Deacons, who left messages on our call-in line. Thanks to Theresa Seeber, who was inspired to share a clip from The Pick of Destiny (caution: f-bombs), my college pal Ryan Busby, and some more folks we have to save for next time. If you want to join in the fun, you can call us at 678-590-BREW.

Standard Podcast [ 1:02:18 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share
Filed Under: podcast Tagged With: Emmaus Way, hermeneutics, Tim Conder

Transforming Theology w/ Denomination Heads

May 28, 2009 by Tripp Fuller 6 Comments

Round One

Sweet Quotes from random people at the Transforming Theology conference.:

‘It has been a long time since someone thought Liberal or Progressive and thought Lutheran….Disagreement doesn’t mean lack of charity. ‘

‘So many Methodist, so little time.’

‘There is no God who ceases to be creator, and who can therefore be played off against what has been created; there is no such thing as God-pleasing religion that absolves us from our everyday duties; and there is no Holy Scripture that allows men to sin and relieves us of our every duties absolute responsibility to our neighbor.’, quoted from ‘jesus means freedom’

‘What are all the American progressive mainline denominations going to do when we take the global majority seriously.  The church has the opportunity to take them more seriously than the rest of the country.  Wouldn’t it be nice for the church in the first world to lead in a non-colonial activity?’

‘The Bible is a library and we have lived in that library…’

‘Calvin invented the sewer system in Geneva…Presbyterians really believe Christ should transform society. There maybe 5 ways of Christ relating to culture, but we think there is a correct answer…So many like to think we are ‘christ transforming culutre,’ it is often a myth we tell ourselves to justify internalizing culture.’

‘We often think the church’s social witness comes through well-written paper.’

‘One of the problem with social justice for Protestants is that they came into being without a peasant class.’

‘The National Council of Churches lacks some place of authority to ground its common work.  So we end up with resolutions that we then tack a theological reasoning behind.  This makes the NCC a social justice organization and not a faith community, we can’t do theology together.’

We need to name the gospel principles as the heart of our witness.  Both political parties see security as a unilateral action of the government.  Christians don’t see it that way, security is about interdependence.

Round Two

Chris Copeland ‘Denominations want to be a church’s supermarket, we need to be a farmer’s market.’

‘Some of the denominational fights about the Eucharist have felt like ‘Where’s Waldo.’

We need to learn a theology of resistance from Bonhoeffer.

Denomination heads are scared of YouTube because of Jeremiah Wright….Fox News wins!!!!

White ministers should read ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail’ once a year devotionally, it helps one avoid becoming a member of the council of caution.

What is the proper exercise of authoritative teaching about justice issues?  The moment you get particular about something it takes authority for it to be more than someone’s opinion.

‘In preserving the notion of ‘social justice’ are we not keeping the partitioned notion of the gospel that is the problem?’, Barry Taylor (who nailed it)

‘This Faith’, the key to understanding the UCC faith statement.  What is this faith?

The sole head, Jesus Christ, Son of God and Savior. It acknowledges as kindred in Christ all who share in this confession. It looks to the Word of God in the Scriptures, and to the presence and power of the Holy Spirit, to prosper its creative and redemptive work in the world. It claims as its own the faith of the historic Church expressed in the ancient creeds and reclaimed in the basic insights of the Protestant Reformers.

Unitarian Universalist….Unitarian means we are an institutional form of the Arian heresy….Universalist means we are radical leftist Weslyians.

How do we organize our compassion?  We need to avoid justice out of our own need for absolution.  If we don’t our ‘acts of justice’ are driven by our own anxiety.

There is a tension between the respect for history and the freedom to write history.

‘Under the Lordship of Christ the freedom of Christ allows and empowers all forms of contextual justice seeking.’

‘It is not the conclusions we come to about particular social justice issues that makes them Christian, it is how we conduct the conversation in love, preserve the unity of Christ, and freedom of the Other through the process.  I have real convictions about justice, but to use them unjustly on another Christian is an affront to the table of Christ where all are welcome.’

Sharon Watkins is awesome….really really awesome.

The 5th side of the Weslyian quadrilateral…cultural respectability.

‘I decided to be an activist because there I could preach and attempt to act the kingdom.’

‘There is the lurking suspiscion that if Jesus was here today he wouldn’t be preaching to us, but at us. It is hard to preach the kingdom when it is ‘we’ who are keeping it from happening.’

‘We shouldn’t personalize the shame of the kingdom and collectivize the responsibility.  We should do the reverse.  The kingdom Jesus preached colletivized the shame and personalized the responsibility.’

Emergence wants to know ‘What in Christianity is worth dying for?  If you can’t answer that question we don’t want anything of it.’

Round Three

‘The environmental crisis and nuclear threat necessitate the the church to speak with boldness and a clarity that could make the pews (and US) uncomfortable.’

Mainline denominations have had a decline of city churches.  In the past city churches were the progressive congregations of the denominations.  Now?

We need to stop talking about the ‘golden age’ of some church, then we can try to be useful.  A long blink leads you to miss a golden age.

How do you know the difference when you are building bridges between different varities of Christians and using the conversation as a means to tell the other group they need to grow up, wise up, and be like you?

‘The only thing we can’t talk to are the ones we share the Westminster Confession with!’, pcusa about pca

What about divorce in our denomination? Is there an ecclesiology of divorce? (church divorce and not couples)

A fellow Demon Deacon is representing.  We are awesome.

We like to call ourselves the reconciling community, that means we have to listen carfully to what is going on around us.  Listening and forgiving are necessary for all forms of Christian action.

Thoughtful Christian is a cool resource.

‘Anti-racist, anti-oppressive, multi-cultural church’  say that ten times fast.

‘In a covenantal community the conversation is authoritative, the history of the conversation is authoritative.’

‘We like to tell our favorite part of our history and pretend it is the truth about who we are.’

‘Jesus didn’t leave the city…we have.’

‘The God of extravagant Welcome!’

‘The emergent church doesn’t have to happen at the expense of anything else.  This is a both\and world.’

Emergent is not a demographic but a psycographic, how we process information.

Are we saving the record industry or the music? We keep acting as if we are in a postal age, but what about the email age?  People receive their media through iPods or big screen TVs.  The church is selling 20 inch tube TVs.

As many people find their life mate online as in the church.

Share
Filed Under: living

Google’s Offensive Logo

May 20, 2009 by Chad Crawford 1 Comment

Google is displaying their excitement about the ‘missing link’ news with a special logo, and Christians respond with love disgust.

picture-5

Share
Filed Under: engaging Tagged With: evolution, fossils, Google

Texans Putting Their Faith into Action Against New Coal Plants

May 15, 2009 by Chad Crawford Leave a Comment

In 2007, I was in North Carolina, desperately trying to survive my final year of divinity school. Specifically, I spent the majority of the year filling my head with ecotheology and getting fired up about ridding the world of fossil fuels. I remember sitting in class, outraged that Rick Perry, the secessionist Governor of my home state of Texas, was fast-tracking the construction of 19 new coal plants. He was doing this solely because he knew that the public was beginning to see the dangers of greenhouse gases, and he foresaw federal regulation on the horizon. Perry knew he had to help TXU, who funds his campaigns, get as many coal plants grandfathered in as possible.

But this story has a happy ending. People of faith in Texas joined the grassroots effort to stop the madness. From their unique perspective, the faith community brought deep convictions to the argument against Perry, and the public turned on him. A judge ruled that Perry did not have the authority to carry out his efforts, and the number of proposed coal plants were dramatically reduced.

Here is a short film about the faith community’s involvement in the Texas coal wars. I encourage you to share this with your friends as an example of how faith can have a transformative effect on the world. You can also download a discussion guide to host a screening in your congregation. Yes this is a shameless plug for the organization I work for. But because of my belief that this is a super case study for big things that we can do for the world, I would share it anyway. And you should too.

Covenant from Alpheus Media on Vimeo.

Share
Filed Under: engaging, politics Tagged With: Rick Perry, Texas Interfaith Power & Light, TXU

Atheist Fundamentalism and Questions of Truth

May 12, 2009 by Tripp Fuller 2 Comments

John Polkinghorne, the Cambridge physicist turned Anglican Priest, has a new book that just came out titled ‘Questions of Truth: Fifty-one Responses to Questions About God, Science, and Belief.’ It is based on a Polkinghorne’s Question and Answer forum online, so you can check it out there if you are interested.

In a review posted at the New Humanist by AC Grayling you get a taste of the self-fulfilling hermeneutic imployed by the New Athiests when reading articulate scientists who likewise have faith.  After complaining about Plokinghorne’s use of the strong anthrophic principle (a legitimit criticism) and Christians who continue to interpet scripture in light of best scientific and historical data, Grayling shoots straight with his readers:

Thus in short, on the religious side of things you make up truth as you go along, by interpreting and reinterpreting scripture to suit your needs and to avoid refutation by confrontation with plain fact; and thus it is that Beale-Polkinghorne can claim that both science and religion seek truth.

Now if you don’t see a scientific fundamentalist heremeneutic being used let me rewrite it as if I was a Biblical Fundy.

Thus in short, these dimwit scientists keep making up truth as they go along.  They just keep interpreting and reinterpreting so-called evidence and data to suit their needs and to avoid refutation by confrontation with plain facts of scripture. Today we got a warming planet, but when I was in school they told me my areosal hair spray was going to lead to a global freeze…..

The point is not that science or religion should or shouldn’t impose on the other, that relationship can be handled elsewhere.  What bothers me is a form of science or religion that sees the truth it seeks to speak of as above or prior to interpretation.  I actually think science is privileged above other forms of knowledge because of its verifiability, but we shouldn’t forget that the interpretation of the data today can and will be different in fifty years.  It will be different because it is committed to truth. This continuing interpetive process is in fact how we make and keep our ideas clear.

Grayling cannot stand the idea of science and religion both seeking truth together and so his evangelical atheist rhetoric flares up:

I would call this dishonest if I did not think it is in fact delusion, which, since a kind of lunatic sincerity is involved, it rather palpably shows itself to be. And it happens that ‘lunatic’ is appropriate here, for the painful experience of wading through this book gave me an epiphany: that religious faith is extremely similar to the kind of conspiracy theory that sufferers from paranoid delusions can hold: the faithful see a purposive hand in everything, plotting and controlling and guiding, and interpret all their experience accordingly.

From my reading of Polkinghorne he is not attempting to reject or manipulate the eye towards scientific data, but to demonstrate the possibility of there being ‘more much more than meets the eye.’  Like many of his New Atheist counterparts, Grayling’s inability to tolerate a religous interpretation of the data leads him to avoid actually debating where the scientific data eliminates this interpretation.

Popular Science interviewed Polkinghorne and you can find that here.

Share
Filed Under: books, engaging, science

Tell us what you want, what you really really want….on the Podcast

May 12, 2009 by Tripp Fuller 12 Comments

Over the summer Chad and I will be recording a bunch of podcasts to share with the Homebrewed Christianity Deaconate.  While we do not lack confidence in our ability to select rockin’ guests, we want to know now…..

Who should we invite on the podcast?

What topics are worth a series of interviews?

When Chad and I go to a live tapping of Conan O’Brien should we wear matching pinstripe suits?

Your responses are valued and appreciated.

Brew On!

Share
Filed Under: living, politics

2010: The National Year of Theocracy

May 11, 2009 by Chad Crawford Leave a Comment

Representative Paul Broun (R-GA) introduced a resolution in the House (H. Con. Res. 121) that will encourage the president to designate 2010 as the ‘National Year of the Bible’. It’s entertaining how Broun tries to make the text of the bill sound untheocratic and by no means a violation of Church/State separation – ‘Hey, we’re just honoring the world’s best-selling book! What’s the problem?’

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Encouraging the President to designate 2010 as ‘The National Year of the Bible’.

Whereas the Bible has had a profound impact in shaping America into a great Nation;

Whereas deep religious beliefs stemming from the Old and New Testament of the Bible have inspired Americans from all walks of life, especially the early settlers, whose faith, spiritual courage, and moral strength enabled them to endure intense hardships in this new land;

Whereas many of our Presidents have recognized the importance of God and the Bible, including George Washington; Franklin D. Roosevelt; Harry Truman; John F. Kennedy; Ronald Reagan, who declared 1983 as ‘The National Year of the Bible’; and especially Abraham Lincoln, whose 200th Birthday Celebration in 2009 highlighted freedom for the slaves;

Whereas shared Biblical beliefs unified the colonists and gave our early leaders the wisdom to write the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States, both of which recognized the inherent worth, dignity, and inalienable rights of each individual, thus unifying a diverse people with the right to vote, and the freedoms of speech and vast religious freedoms, which inspired courageous men like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to lead the Civil Rights Movement;

Whereas the Bible has been the world’s best selling book since it was first published in English in 1526, and has influenced more people than any other book;

Whereas the Bible has been a cornerstone in the development of Western civilization, influencing the nations in the areas of history, law, politics, culture, music, literature, art, drama, and especially moral philosophy;

Whereas the Bible, used as a moral guide, has inspired compassion, love for our neighbor, and the preciousness of life and marriage, and has stimulated many benevolent, faith-based community initiatives and neighborhood partnerships that have healed and blessed our families, communities, and our entire Nation, especially in times of war, tragedy, and economic and social crisis;

Whereas the Bible has inspired acts of patriotism that have unified Americans, commemorated through shared celebrations such as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Presidents Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving, and Christmas

But now for the scary part, and I’m going to go ahead and add emphasis on the exact place where it calls on all the other religions to bow down and worship Jesus:

Whereas 2010 is an appropriate year to designate as ‘The National Year of the Bible’: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the President is encouraged–

(1) to designate an appropriate year as ‘The National Year of the Bible’; and

(2) to issue a proclamation calling upon citizens of all faiths to rediscover and apply the priceless, timeless message of the Holy Scripture which has profoundly influenced and shaped the United States and its great democratic form of Government, as well as its rich spiritual heritage, and which has unified, healed, and strengthened its people for over 200 years.

On the other hand, I think it would be interesting if the government instituted a National Year of Living Biblically.

Share
Filed Under: engaging Tagged With: National Year of the Bible, Paul Broun, theocracy

Ricoeur, Rollins, and Roberts on Parables

May 11, 2009 by Tripp Fuller 2 Comments

To listen to the Parables of  Jesus, it seems to me, is to let one’s imagination be opened to the new possibilities disclosed by the extravagance of these short dramas. If we look at the Parables as at a word at rest first to our imagination rather than our will, we shall not be tempted to reduce them to mere didactic devices, to moralizing allegories. We will let their poetic power display its self within us.,  ‘Listening to the Parables of Jesus’ in The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: An Anthology of His Work (245).

Deacon Zach Roberts has a new post on the Parables of Jesus over at Baptimergent.  It is definitely worth reading, so check it out.

The irony of parables is that most readers assume they vindicate their own cause, when actually they implicate us for our participation in injustice. If Jesus were addressing these parables to whiny emerging Baptists, he would have been at a Wal-Mart McCafe networking with white male denominational executives on a PC.

Peter Rollins, who recently published a book of parables, says:

A parable can be loosely described as a short, fictional narrative that draws the reader ?into an insight concerning some aspect of faith and life. Parables often work best when ?they challenge commonly held attitudes and unmask the poverty of some widely held value. Parables are generally structured in a very simple and stark way, with a narrative that avoids any unnecessary detail that may detract from the central, evocative message.

Share
Filed Under: books, pomo, quotes, thinking

The Evolution of God and the Religious Human

May 10, 2009 by Tripp Fuller 1 Comment

I have been thinking about getting Robert Wright’s upcoming book ‘The Evolution of God’ since his recent article in the Atlantic last month.  Not being as cool as Andrew Sullivan I didn’t get an advanced copy, but I did read his review which makes me more interested in reading his upcoming book.  None the less, Andrew closes his review with a description of how the questions of the Ultimate, the ones religion is made of, and the quest for truth have played out in his own life.  You can see why he (And my boy Drew who blogged this recently) is a blogger-el-bad-a$$.

My own view, as a struggling and doubting person of faith, is that truth matters in whatever mode we find it … but ultimate truth, because we are not ultimate beings, will always elude us. The search for this truth is the point, illuminated in my own faith by Jesus. Humans cannot live without this search, never have and never will. Our consciousness asks questions to which there will never be a complete answer; we are religious because we are human. And the challenge of our time is neither the arrogant dismissal of religious life and heritage, nor the rigid insistence that all metaphysical questions are already answered or unaskable, but a humble openness to history and science and revelation in the journey of faith.

He summaries Wright’s thesis this way:

It’s (the evolution of God) not a linear process … misunderstanding, violence, stupidity, pride and anger will always propel human beings backwards just when they seem on the verge of progress. Greater proximity has often meant greater hatred … as one god has marshalled earthly forces against another. But in the very, very long run, as human beings have realised that religion is nothing if not true and that truth can be grasped or sought in many different ways, doctrines have evolved. Through science and travel, conversation and scholarship, interpretation and mysticism … our faiths have adapted throughout history, like finches on Darwin’s islands.

Wright’s core and vital point is that this is not a descent into total relativism or randomness. It is propelled by reason interacting with revelation, coupled with sporadic outbreaks of religious doubt and sheer curiosity. The Evolution of God is best understood as the evolution of human understanding of truth … even to the edge of our knowledge where mystery and meditation take over.

UPDATE: new interview with Wright

Share
Filed Under: books, engaging
« Older Posts

Search

Support the brew

The latest

  • A Panentheistic Think Piece With Motions!
  • Creation Out of Nothing is Overrated (For Tony Jones)
  • What has changed since I was your pastor
  • Pastor, Priest, Prophets: Lead in Praxis not in Pronouncement!
  • Theology UnCorked on “Christianity + Homosexuality = ?”
  • Christian Matter: The Beloved Wilderness

Transforming Christian Theology

The Homebrewed Hosting Service

Host Unlimited Domains on 1 Account Happy Holidays! Download a FREE audiobook today!

Friends

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2012 · Delicious Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Podcast powered by podPress v8.8.10.13